AI can help organize research, suggest outlines, or improve clarity, but a generated draft is not automatically accurate or useful. Verify every policy statement against Google’s current source, every date against an authoritative source, and every example to ensure it is clearly hypothetical or based on documented experience. Remove invented quotations, unsupported statistics, and claims that a tool can guarantee approval.
Add a human contribution that matters: firsthand testing, a comparison method, interviews, original screenshots, a calculation, or careful analysis of a real user problem. Explain limitations and cite sources near claims. If AI assisted with drafting, follow your editorial standards and applicable disclosure expectations. Do not publish dozens of lightly modified pages just to target keyword variations.
Google Search’s spam policies say scaled content abuse can involve large amounts of unoriginal content created with AI or other methods when the primary purpose is manipulating rankings rather than helping users. That does not mean every use of AI is prohibited; the useful distinction is whether the published pages provide value and comply with applicable policies. Google’s AdSense readiness guidance also emphasizes unique content relevant to visitors.
Use SiteReadyScore to find observable gaps, then assign a human editor to confirm each finding and write a distinct, evidence-supported fix. A scan can guide research; it cannot confer expertise or verify generated text.
Editorial safeguards: Source check; factual review; plagiarism/originality check; example provenance; policy-link check; human edit; final reader-task review.